Home std test kit for nutrition are becoming more popular as people want to monitor the nutritional content of foods. These tests can be rather expensive though so parents are often concerned about whether these home tests are accurate and reliable. A lot depends on the type of food being tested. Some foods can be tested using kits while others will require more detailed testing.
The kit home tests for nutrition are usually easy to use. They just need to be swallowed to obtain a sample of the material contained in the food. There is no need for any kind of specialized equipment or utensils to make this test work. The test results are normally given within three days. The saliva tends to remove a large part of the material in the food so a test strip is used to identify the amount of protein, fat, carbohydrates, and fiber in the food. This strip is then tested on a laboratory computer to determine what nutrients are in the sample.
One problem with home tests for nutrition is that there is no way to know if the test is correct. This is especially true with carbohydrate tests. A lot of these tests do not differentiate between simple sugars and complex carbohydrates. Other tests for specific nutrients are also not accurate because of the inherent difficulty of detecting the effects of various amounts of sugar, fat, and carbohydrates. Because of these reasons, it is necessary to have expert help perform such tests.
Another problem with home tests for nutrition is that results are only valid for a 24-hour period. So unless a person is eating the same foods for an extended period, the results of the test cannot be relied upon. A couple of companies that offer these tests offer a money-back guarantee. This enables consumers to try the tests themselves and see if they work. Many people find that these tests are very accurate because they use a sensitive and specific method for detecting various types of food.
However, as with anything else in life, there are some advantages and disadvantages. For one thing, the sensitivity of these tests is considerably higher than the sensitivity of most clinical tests used in hospitals. This means that home tests for nutrition can sometimes result in false positive results. Also, since the analysis of foods is rather difficult, it may require more than one test to detect abnormalities. Lastly, even if a home test for nutrition does give accurate results, the Food and Drug Administration does not guarantee the results, as this has only been tested in a small number of cases.
The best tests for nutrition are those performed by experts. Companies that specialize in testing foods for various nutrient levels can be more accurate than a home test. But even when a company uses an expensive test for analysis, it is still recommended that a consumer performs another test on the foods themselves to make sure that the results are accurate. This way, the consumer can be absolutely certain that the foods indicated on the test are actually in the diet of the person taking the test.